NURSING-MISC Mid-State Technical College – Consider the various patient care delivery methods.

Consider the various patient care delivery methods.

Describe the method used on your unit or within your clinical setting.

Compare and contrast it with the models from your readings. Is it the same?

If not, what modifications make it different?

Is it an effective way to give care on the unit? If so, why? If not, why not?

ANSWER

Patient Care Delivery Methods: A Comparative Analysis and Evaluation

Introduction

Patient care delivery methods play a critical role in healthcare settings, ensuring effective and efficient care delivery. In this essay, we will examine the patient care delivery method employed within my unit or clinical setting and compare it with models discussed in relevant readings. By exploring similarities, differences, and modifications, we aim to assess the effectiveness of the current method in providing optimal care.

Patient Care Delivery Method on my Unit

In my clinical setting, we employ a team-based patient care delivery method known as the Interprofessional Collaborative Practice (ICP) model. The ICP model emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration among healthcare professionals to provide comprehensive and coordinated care to patients (Chamangwana, 2021). It brings together various healthcare disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and therapists, to work collectively in a patient-centered manner.

Comparison with Models from Readings

When comparing the ICP model with other models discussed in relevant readings, such as the Primary Nursing Model and the Functional Nursing Model, several similarities and differences emerge.

Similarities

Patient-Centered Approach: Both the ICP model and the Primary Nursing Model prioritize delivering patient-centered care, recognizing the unique needs and preferences of individual patients.

Collaboration: The ICP model shares similarities with the Primary Nursing Model in promoting collaboration among healthcare professionals. Both models recognize the importance of communication, coordination, and teamwork in achieving positive patient outcomes.

Differences

Care Allocation: Unlike the Primary Nursing Model, where a single primary nurse assumes overall responsibility for the patient’s care, the ICP model distributes care responsibilities among a team of healthcare professionals (Supper et al., 2014). Each team member contributes their expertise and actively participates in decision-making processes.

Scope of Practice: In the Functional Nursing Model, tasks are allocated to specific staff members based on their roles, resulting in a fragmented approach to care. Conversely, the ICP model encourages interprofessional collaboration, allowing healthcare professionals to work at the top of their licenses and share responsibilities within their respective scopes of practice.

Modifications and Differences

The ICP model implemented in my unit has undergone some modifications to cater to our specific patient population and organizational needs. These modifications have led to notable differences from the original ICP model described in the literature.

Specialized Teams: To address the unique needs of our patient population, we have established specialized teams within the ICP model. These teams focus on specific medical conditions, such as cardiac care, orthopedics, or oncology. This modification enables enhanced expertise and streamlined care delivery for patients with complex conditions.

Structured Communication: We have implemented structured communication processes, such as daily huddles and interdisciplinary rounds, to enhance information sharing, ensure care continuity, and foster collaborative decision-making. This modification strengthens coordination among team members and promotes efficient care delivery.

Effectiveness of the ICP Model in our Unit

The ICP model employed in our unit has proven to be an effective way to deliver care for several reasons.

Comprehensive Care: By leveraging the collective knowledge and expertise of various healthcare professionals, the ICP model ensures comprehensive and holistic care for patients (Jasemi et al., 2017). It allows for a thorough assessment, coordination of treatments, and management of patients’ physical, psychological, and social needs.

Improved Patient Outcomes: The collaborative nature of the ICP model enables timely interventions, reduces medical errors, and enhances patient safety. The integration of multiple perspectives and skills contributes to improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Enhanced Efficiency: The distributed care responsibilities and specialized teams within the ICP model promote efficient resource utilization, reduce duplication of efforts, and optimize workflow. This leads to streamlined care processes, shorter hospital stays, and improved bed turnover rates.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Interprofessional Collaborative Practice (ICP) model employed in my unit exhibits similarities with other care delivery models, such as the Primary Nursing Model, but also distinct differences due to modifications made to suit our patient population and organizational needs. The ICP model has proven to be an effective way to deliver care, as it promotes comprehensive care, improves patient outcomes, and enhances efficiency. By encouraging collaboration, communication, and the utilization of diverse healthcare expertise, the ICP model optimizes the delivery of care in our unit, ultimately benefiting both patients and healthcare professionals.

References

Chamangwana, I. C. (2021). Experiences of health care workers’ on interprofessional collaborative practice at Mzuzu Central and Ntcheu District hospitals. PubMed Central (PMC). https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v33iS.3 

Jasemi, M., Valizadeh, L., Zamanzadeh, V., & Keogh, B. (2017). A concept analysis of holistic care by hybrid model. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 23(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.197960 

Supper, I., Catala, O., Lustman, M., Chemla, C., Bourgueil, Y., & Letrilliart, L. (2014). Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. Journal of Public Health, 37(4), 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu102