Analysis of Fed FOMC Press Interviews

Please provide a synopsis of the attached Fed Chairman’s

January 30th 2019

September 18th 2019

January 29th 2020

Sept 19 2020

Please provide an overall summary of the Federal Reserve’s Chair Press Conferences

Include in your analysis

“The COVID-19 pandemic is causing tremendous human and economic hardship across the United States and around the world. Economic activity and employment have picked up in recent months but remain well below their levels at the beginning of the year. Weaker demand and significantly lower oil prices are holding down consumer price inflation. Overall financial conditions have improved in recent months, in part reflecting policy measures to support the economy and the flow of credit to U.S. households and businesses. ”

& also

“My colleagues and I have one overarching goal: to sustain the economic expansion, with a strong job market and stable prices, for the benefit of the American people. ”

How is this central objective achieved.

What was the FOMC’s decision in each case. What is the state of employment and inflation in the US economy.

What was the FOMC’s most recent decision.

How similar and how different was the press conference of the Fed chairperson after the meeting?

Elaborate on at least four subject matters that he presented.

Elaborate on at least three pertinent questions that the press asked.

Elaborate on the FOMC’s role in setting and implementing monetary policy.

Explain the mechanism of a rate cut by the FOMC and its impact, if any, in the US economy.

How is the federal reserve trying to effect the financial markets and the economy as a whole?

What was its policy prior and what is it after the 2020 pandemic?

FOMCpresconf20190130 FED.pdf

https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcpresconf20190619.htm

https://www.federalreserve.gov/mediacenter/files/FOMCpresconf20190918.pdf

https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20190918a.htm

Quality of Assignment Content
—
Levels of Achievement:
Quality of assignment content
Unacceptable
0 (0.00%) points
Submission does not display an understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Minimal 0.42 (42.00%) points
Submission demonstrates a minimal understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Competent 0.49 (49.00%) points
Submission demonstrates some understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Effective 0.595 (59.50%) points
Submission demonstrates a general understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Master 0.7 (70.00%) points
Submission demonstrates a full understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Mechanics and Readability of Assignment
—
Levels of Achievement:
Mechanics and Readability of assignment
Unacceptable
0 (0.00%) points
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in all literacy standards. Assignment is not understandable to the reader. Frequent errors in spelling and capitalization: profound and/or inaccurate punctuation which render the submission unreadable.
Minimal 0.09 (9.00%) points
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in most literacy standards. Assignment is unclear and not understandable to the reader. Contains many and serious intrusive errors of punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization which partially inhibit readability.
Competent 0.105 (10.50%) points
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in some areas of literacy standards. Assignment is partially clear and understandable to the reader. Contains several punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization errors, but does not inhibit readability.
Effective 0.1275 (12.75%) points
Writing demonstrates mastery of most criteria for high academic literacy standards. Assignment is mostly clear and understandable to the reader. Contains only occasional punctuation, spelling, and /or capitalization errors.
Master 0.15 (15.00%) points
Writing demonstrates mastery of all criteria for high academic literacy standards. Assignment is clearly understandable to the reader. Free of punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors.
Structure and Organization/ Format/ Presentation of Assignment
—
Levels of Achievement:
Structure And Organization/ format/ presentation of assignment
Unacceptable
0 (0.00%) points
Submission is not appropriate for assignment. Does not follow directions as indicated by instructor. References and citations are not included if requested. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner.
Minimal 0.09 (9.00%) points
Submission follows minimal directions and is missing many components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are not included and/or properly cited. Errors in format several interfere with meaning, formatting weak.
Competent 0.105 (10.50%) points
Submission does not follow all directions and is missing some components indicated in the instructions. If requested, some references are included and partially cited properly. Several errors in formatting, or format is inconsistent.
Effective 0.1275 (12.75%) points
Submission follows directions and includes most components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and mostly cited properly. Few formatting errors.
Master 0.15 (15.00%) points
Submission follows direction and includes all components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and properly cited. Appropriate format and presentation for assignment.
Quality of Assignment Content
—
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points
Submission does not display an understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Minimal 0.42 (42.00%) points
Submission demonstrates a minimal understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Competent 0.49 (49.00%) points
Submission demonstrates some understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Effective 0.595 (59.50%) points
Submission demonstrates a general understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Master 0.7 (70.00%) points
Submission demonstrates a full understanding of the associated learning objectives presented in the assignment.
Mechanics and Readability of Assignment
—
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in all literacy standards. Assignment is not understandable to the reader. Frequent errors in spelling and capitalization: profound and/or inaccurate punctuation which render the submission unreadable.
Minimal 0.09 (9.00%) points
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in most literacy standards. Assignment is unclear and not understandable to the reader. Contains many and serious intrusive errors of punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization which partially inhibit readability.
Competent 0.105 (10.50%) points
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized in some areas of literacy standards. Assignment is partially clear and understandable to the reader. Contains several punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization errors, but does not inhibit readability.
Effective 0.1275 (12.75%) points
Writing demonstrates mastery of most criteria for high academic literacy standards. Assignment is mostly clear and understandable to the reader. Contains only occasional punctuation, spelling, and /or capitalization errors.
Master 0.15 (15.00%) points
Writing demonstrates mastery of all criteria for high academic literacy standards. Assignment is clearly understandable to the reader. Free of punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors.
Structure and Organization/ Format/ Presentation of Assignment
—
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points
Submission is not appropriate for assignment. Does not follow directions as indicated by instructor. References and citations are not included if requested. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner.
Minimal 0.09 (9.00%) points
Submission follows minimal directions and is missing many components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are not included and/or properly cited. Errors in format several interfere with meaning, formatting weak.
Competent 0.105 (10.50%) points
Submission does not follow all directions and is missing some components indicated in the instructions. If requested, some references are included and partially cited properly. Several errors in formatting, or format is inconsistent.
Effective 0.1275 (12.75%) points
Submission follows directions and includes most components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and mostly cited properly. Few formatting errors.
Master 0.15 (15.00%) points
Submission follows direction and includes all components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and properly cited. Appropriate format and presentation for assignment.Levels of Achievement: