A major proposal analysis

INTRODUCTION
In this task, you will write an analysis of one work (suggested length of 3–6 paragraphs total). Choose one work from one time period in the list of accepted works below:
***work is already done but return for correction i just need to rewrite it to match the grading rubric***

Enlightenment:

Jonathan Swift, “A Modest Proposal” 1729 (satirical essay)
Mary Wollstonecraft, Excerpt from Chapter 9 from A Vindication of the Rights of Woman 1792 (essay).

Use the link near the bottom of this page to access direct links to the acceptable works listed above. Once you have selected one of the accepted works from the list above, you will research the work, the life of the author/artist, and the period. You will then be ready to create your analysis. This process of analysis will require you to discuss the events or innovations that define the historical period when the work was created, analyze a theme or stylistic characteristic of the period that is reflected in the work, and finally analyze the work’s or author’s/artist’s/composer’s contribution to the humanities.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A. Analyze the accepted work by doing the following:
1. Describe the historical events or innovations that characterize the period in which the work was created (suggested length of 1–2 paragraphs).
2. Analyze how this work reflects a theme or stylistic characteristic from its period (suggested length of 1–2 paragraphs).
3. Analyze the work’s or author’s/artist’s/composer’s contributions to the humanities (suggested length of 1–2 paragraphs).

B. When you use sources to support ideas and elements in a paper or project, provide acknowledgement of source information for any content that is quoted, paraphrased or summarized. Acknowledgement of source information includes in-text citation noting specifically where in the submission the source is used and a corresponding reference, which includes the following points:
• author
• date
• title
• location of information (e.g., publisher, journal, website URL)

C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
RUBRIC
A1:PERIOD CHARACTERIZATION
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide a description of the historical events or innovations that define the selected period.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission provides an inaccurate description of the historical events or innovations that define the selected period.
COMPETENT
The submission provides an accurate description of the historical events or innovations that define the selected period.
A2:WORK ANALYSIS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide an analysis that describes how the work explores a particular theme or stylistic characteristic from its period.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission provides an analysis that inaccurately describes how the work explores a particular theme or stylistic characteristic from its period.
COMPETENT
The submission provides an analysis that accurately describes how the work explores a particular theme or stylistic characteristic from its period.
A3:HUMANITIES CONTRIBUTION
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide an analysis of the work’s or author’s/artist’s/composer’s contributions to the humanities.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission provides an inaccurate analysis of the work’s or author’s/artist’s/composer’s contributions to the humanities.
COMPETENT
The submission provides an accurate analysis of the work’s or author’s/artist’s/composer’s contributions to the humanities.
B:SOURCES
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.
COMPETENT
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
C:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.
COMPETENT
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.