California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd Ed

25% – Research paper (Integrative Assignment) and Presentation

Students will explore the empirical literature and assigned readings to write a final 15-18 pages well synthesized paper on “Test review and Critique”. The Test Review/Critique contains six sections, including references. Information to be presented in each section is presented in the student guidelines for integrative assignment below. All references must be scholarly and cited. APA format must be used. Prepare a 15-20 minutes presentation using PowerPoint slides to cover the items listed on the guidelines. Upload your paper on Moodle.

Student Guidelines for Integrative Assignment

TEST REVIEW AND CRITIQUE

Due Date: November 23, 2020.
Format of Test Critique
* Word-processed, double-spaced, and stapled.
* Approximately 15-18 pages.
* American Psychological Association (APA) writing style for headings, citations and references
* You are allowed to use up to four direct quotes, correctly cited.
Directions:
After you have selected (or been assigned) a particular test to review/critique, identify the resources you will use to complete the assignment. Your instructor will provide information about where he/she would like you to obtain information about the test.
Structure and Content of Test Critique
The Test Review/Critique contains six sections, including references. Information to be presented in each section is presented below.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION

Titleofthetest(includingeditionandform,ifapplicable)

Author(s)

Publisheranddate(s)ofpublication

Cost(booklets,answersheets,othertestmaterials,availablescoringservices)

Availability of online version

II. TEST DESCRIPTION

A. TestContent

construct(s), domain(s) or variable(s) the test measures

unidimensionality or multidimensionality of construct

theoretical and/or empirical foundations of the test

B. Purpose of Test

purpose and potential uses of test

whom the test is designed for

C. TestStructure

length of test/number of items

subscales (if applicable)

item format

D. TestAdministration

administration procedures

necessary administrator qualifications and/or training

special testing conditions that must be considered

online administration (if applicable)

E. Test Scoring

type of scoring or scaling

scoring procedures (including availability of scoring keys and scoring services,

if any)

subscale, factor or dimension scores (if applicable)

online scoring (if applicable)

III. TECHNICAL EVALUATION

A. Standardization/Normative Sample

size and demographics of standardization sample

procedures followed in obtaining sample

adequacy of standardization sample

adequacy of norms provided (e.g., availability of subgroup norms, if applicable)

B. Reliability
1. evidence of reliability (e.g., test-retest, internal consistency)

2. adequacy of reliability evidence to support potential uses of the test C. V alidity

evidence of validity (e.g., content-, criterion-, construct-related)

adequacy of validity evidence to support potential uses of the test

IV. PRACTICAL EVALUATION

A.Quality of Test Materials

1. quality of writing in test materials (including appropriateness of reading level) 2. quality of graphic design and presentation in test materials

3. other aspects of materials quality (e.g., durability, attractiveness, etc.)

B.Ease of Administration, Scoring and Interpretation

clarity and comprehensiveness of instructions, directions or guidance

provided

amount of time and resources needed to administer, score and interpret test

other practical aspects of administration, scoring and interpretation

V: SUMMARY EVALUATION AND CRITIQUE

A. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Test B. Recommendations

for uses of the test

for revisions or updates

for further study of the test

VI. REFERENCES