ICU nurse Intraprofessional Collaboration Reflection

Attached is a paper with ideas on how to get started, we don’t necessarily have to stick to those.

Another paper providing an example t by an informatics analyst on how the paper should be completed.

This is an APA Style transcript of a video where an ICU nurse reflect on how they collaborated intraprofessionally.

Requirements:

2-4 Pages (not including Cover and Reference Page)

APA Style

Cite at least 3 professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements

Be sure that your assessment addresses the following criteria. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you will know what is needed for a distinguished score:

Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.

Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources, citing supporting evidence from the literature.

Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing at least one author from the literature.

Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team achieve its goals and work together, citing the work of at least one author.

Communicate in a professional manner, is easily audible, and uses proper grammar. Format reference list in current APA style.

You will need to relate an experience that you have had collaborating on a project. This could be at your current or former place of practice, or another relevant project that will enable you to address the requirements. In addition to describing your experience, you should explain aspects of the collaboration that helped the team make progress toward relevant goals or outcomes, as well as aspects of the collaboration that could have been improved.

A simplified gap-analysis approach may be useful:

What happened?

What went well?

What did not go well?

What should have happened?