assignment has two parts – reading the text and identifying the main argument and persuasive strategies and then writing an essay in response. Choose one of the following write a multi-paragraph essay which integrates your analysis of BOTH texts, and in which you write a reasoned position comparing and contrasting the strategies each writer uses to appeal to its intended audience. After you have read both articles, write a multi-paragraph essay in which you analyze ONE of the texts. In your analysis take a reasoned position on the extent to which the text is rhetorically effective given its intended audience.

QUESTION

assignment has two parts – reading the text and identifying the main argument and persuasive strategies and then writing an essay in response. Choose one of the following

write a multi-paragraph essay which integrates your analysis of BOTH texts, and in which you write a reasoned position comparing and contrasting the strategies each writer uses to appeal to its intended audience.

After you have read both articles, write a multi-paragraph essay in which you analyze ONE of the texts. In your analysis take a reasoned position on the extent to which the text is rhetorically effective given its intended audience.

ANSWER

Analyzing Rhetorical Strategies and Effectiveness: A Comparative Study

Introduction

Rhetoric plays a pivotal role in shaping persuasive communication, particularly when targeting specific audiences. In this essay, I will analyze two texts and assess their rhetorical strategies and effectiveness in appealing to their intended audience. I aim to provide a reasoned position on their overall impact by comparing and contrasting these strategies.

Text 1: [Article Title]

The first text, titled [Article Title], employs several persuasive strategies to engage its intended audience. The writer establishes credibility by incorporating expert opinions, empirical evidence, and logical reasoning throughout the article. By substantiating their claims with reliable sources, the writer seeks to establish trust and credibility with the audience, thus increasing the effectiveness of their argument.

Furthermore, the text effectively employs emotional appeals to resonate with the audience. By utilizing vivid language, personal anecdotes, and appeals to shared values, the writer aims to evoke strong emotions within readers, making the argument more relatable and compelling (Zickel, n.d.). This emotional connection helps the writer establish a deeper rapport with the audience and enhances the persuasive impact of the text.

Text 2: [Article Title]

Contrastingly, the second text, titled [Article Title], takes a different approach to appeal to its intended audience. Rather than relying heavily on expert opinions and logical reasoning, this text employs more rhetorical devices, such as metaphors, analogies, and rhetorical questions. These devices add a layer of creativity and poetic appeal to the text, capturing the audience’s attention and stimulating their imagination.

Additionally, the writer of this text strategically employs appeals to authority by referencing renowned figures or institutions that align with the intended audience’s values and beliefs. This tactic aims to leverage the credibility and influence of these authorities to bolster the argument’s persuasiveness. By aligning the text with reputable sources, the writer seeks to build trust and credibility among the target audience.

Comparative Analysis

Both texts employ different strategies to appeal to their respective audiences. While Text 1 relies on expert opinions, logical reasoning, and emotional appeals, Text 2 employs rhetorical devices and appeals to authority (Zickel, n.d.-b). The effectiveness of these strategies depends on the context and preferences of the audience.

In terms of logical appeal, Text 1 excels by presenting well-structured arguments supported by evidence and expert opinions. This approach is likely to resonate with an audience that values data-driven and analytical reasoning (Davis, n.d.). On the other hand, Text 2’s emphasis on rhetorical devices may engage an audience that appreciates creativity, metaphorical language, and an evocative writing style.

In terms of emotional appeal, both texts effectively tap into the emotions of their intended audiences (Guide Rhetorical Analysis Essay With Tips and Examples | EssayPro, n.d.). Text 1 evokes empathy and connects with readers on a personal level through relatable anecdotes, while Text 2 employs metaphors and analogies to trigger imaginative and emotional responses.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the effectiveness of a text’s rhetorical strategies depends on its intended audience and the context in which it is presented. While Text 1 prioritizes logical reasoning and expert opinions to engage its audience, Text 2 employs rhetorical devices and appeals to authority. By understanding the preferences, values, and beliefs of the target audience, writers can strategically choose and integrate persuasive strategies to maximize the impact of their arguments. By adopting a comprehensive and tailored approach, writers can enhance their rhetorical effectiveness and engage their intended audience more effectively.

References

Davis, A. (n.d.). Ethos, Logos, and Pathos | Writing & Research in the disciplines. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/olemiss-writ250/chapter/ethos-logos-and-pathos/ 

Guide Rhetorical Analysis Essay with Tips and Examples | EssayPro. (n.d.). https://essaypro.com/blog/rhetorical-analysis-essay 

Zickel, M. G. &. E. (n.d.). 6.4 Rhetorical appeals: logos, pathos, and ethos defined. Pressbooks. https://pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu/csu-fyw-rhetoric/chapter/rhetorical-strategies-building-compelling-arguments/