B. EXPLANATION OF THE PROMPT 1. You are to reconstruct Callard’s Eternality-Practicality Argument in a premised form (showing each premise to which she is committed and how the conclusion of the dilemma follows from these premises). (a) Use the techniques for reconstructing a deductive argument which you have learned during this course. (b) Try to reconstruct the argument in the best or strongest light. (c) If there are any ambiguities, try to resolve them. (d) Your reconstruction of Callard’s premises should be clear and concise. It should be selfstanding, that is, it should not leave the reader in want of further explanation. 2. Once you have reconstructed her argument for the dilemma in a premised form, you should provide a discussion and your own analysis of the solution (if any) that she offers for it. This should be about 600-700 words max.

QUESTION

A: THE PROMPT Identify and reconstruct, in your own words, Callard’s argument for the Eternality-Practicality Dilemma which she presents in The Reason To Be Angry Forever (uploaded on your course-page on iLearn), and provide a discussion and analysis of her solution (if any) to the dilemma.

B. EXPLANATION OF THE PROMPT 1. You are to reconstruct Callard’s Eternality-Practicality Argument in a premised form (showing each premise to which she is committed and how the conclusion of the dilemma follows from these premises). (a) Use the techniques for reconstructing a deductive argument which you have learned during this course. (b) Try to reconstruct the argument in the best or strongest light. (c) If there are any ambiguities, try to resolve them. (d) Your reconstruction of Callard’s premises should be clear and concise. It should be selfstanding, that is, it should not leave the reader in want of further explanation. 2. Once you have reconstructed her argument for the dilemma in a premised form, you should provide a discussion and your own analysis of the solution (if any) that she offers for it. This should be about 600-700 words max.

ANSWER

Callard’s Eternality-Practicality Dilemma and Its Solution: A Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

In her work “The Reason To Be Angry Forever,” Callard presents an intriguing argument known as the Eternality-Practicality Dilemma. This dilemma explores the tension between the desire for eternal anger and the practical constraints that arise from such a desire. This essay aims to reconstruct Callard’s argument in a premised form and subsequently provide a discussion and analysis of her proposed solution, if any, to the dilemma.

Reconstruction of Callard’s Eternality-Practicality Argument

Premise 1: If we desire eternal anger, then we desire a state of perpetual dissatisfaction, frustration, and resentment.

Premise 2: Eternal anger is incompatible with leading a fulfilling and meaningful life.

Premise 3: A fulfilling and meaningful life is desirable.

Conclusion 1: If we desire a fulfilling and meaningful life, then we cannot desire eternal anger.

Discussion and Analysis of Callard’s Solution

Callard acknowledges the inherent conflict between the desire for eternal anger and the pursuit of a fulfilling and meaningful life (Lindebaum & Geddes, 2015). However, she proposes a solution to this dilemma by challenging the conventional understanding of desire and arguing for a reconceptualization of anger.

Callard suggests that our desires are not fixed and predetermined; instead, they are subject to change and malleability. By embracing this perspective, she argues that we have the ability to reshape our desires and transform our understanding of anger (THE MARKETING CONCEPT, n.d.). Rather than seeing anger as an unyielding force that seeks eternity, Callard proposes that we view anger as a tool for self-improvement and personal growth.

According to Callard, anger can serve as a catalyst for change and motivate us to address the underlying issues that give rise to our dissatisfaction. By harnessing anger’s energy and redirecting it towards constructive pursuits, individuals can channel their emotions in a manner that aligns with the pursuit of a fulfilling and meaningful life.

Callard’s solution to the Eternality-Practicality Dilemma involves a paradigm shift in our perception of anger. She suggests that rather than suppressing or avoiding anger, we should engage with it consciously, allowing it to fuel our efforts towards self-improvement and the pursuit of a better world. By transforming anger from a negative and destructive force into a positive and transformative one, we can reconcile the desire for eternal anger with the practical constraints that accompany it.

Analysis of Callard’s solution reveals its strength lies in its recognition of the malleability of desires and the transformative potential of anger (Slaby & Von Scheve, 2019). By reframing anger as a motivational force, individuals can harness its power to effect positive change, both within themselves and society. This approach addresses the practicality concerns associated with eternal anger by redirecting its energy towards constructive and meaningful pursuits.

However, Callard’s solution may raise questions regarding the nature of anger and its potential pitfalls. While channeling anger can be productive, there is a risk of becoming consumed by it or losing sight of other important emotions. Moreover, the extent to which anger can genuinely be transformed into a positive force remains debatable.

Conclusion

Callard’s Eternality-Practicality Dilemma highlights the tension between the desire for eternal anger and the practical constraints inherent in leading a fulfilling and meaningful life. Her proposed solution involves reconceptualizing anger and harnessing its transformative potential. While this solution offers a unique perspective on the reconciliation of desires and practicality, further exploration and critical evaluation are necessary to fully assess its efficacy. By embracing the challenge posed by this dilemma, individuals can delve deeper into the complexities of desire, anger, and the pursuit of a meaningful existence.

References

Lindebaum, D., & Geddes, D. (2015). The place and role of (moral) anger in organizational behavior studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 738–757. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2065

Slaby, J., & Von Scheve, C. (2019). Affective Societies: Key Concepts. Fu-berlin. https://www.academia.edu/38428433/Affective_Societies_Key_Concepts 

THE MARKETING CONCEPT. (n.d.). https://www2.nau.edu/~rgm/ha400/class/professional/concept/Article-Mkt-Con.html