This is your epistemology reading journal in the crash course philosophy video the Host means you want the Grettier case or Grettier problems. Those are cases wherein one may have a justified true belief (for example that there is a sheep in the field but the person actually sees a dog). This is the case where wants is to have knowledge (I am sure that the only thing in the distance is a ship) but I am actually seeing a wooly dog (but there is a sheep hidden from my view in the same field).

QUESTION

PHIL-1030-101-Introduction to Philosophy

This is your epistemology reading journal in the crash course philosophy video the Host means you want the Grettier case or Grettier problems. Those are cases wherein one may have a justified true belief (for example that there is a sheep in the field but the person actually sees a dog). This is the case where wants is to have knowledge (I am sure that the only thing in the distance is a ship) but I am actually seeing a wooly dog (but there is a sheep hidden from my view in the same field).

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
This is your epistemology reading journal in the crash course philosophy video the Host means you want the Grettier case or Grettier problems. Those are cases wherein one may have a justified true belief (for example that there is a sheep in the field but the person actually sees a dog). This is the case where wants is to have knowledge (I am sure that the only thing in the distance is a ship) but I am actually seeing a wooly dog (but there is a sheep hidden from my view in the same field).
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

So in your journal, reflect on these cases that challenge our idea of knowledge. Are there moments of Grettier cases that you have experienced (where you are right for the wrong reasons)?

Reading Journal 5

For this journal, I asked that you write a brief reflection or raise a question about Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy (pp. 88-91)

Reading Journal 4

For this journal please submit a brief reflection on either Anselm’s Ontological or Aquinas cosmological arguments for God’s existence.

ANSWER

Reading Journal 5 – Reflection on Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy

Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy presents an intriguing perspective on the problem of evil and the existence of God. In this theodicy, Hick argues that the presence of evil and suffering in the world is necessary for the development and growth of human souls. He suggests that God allows evil as a means to create opportunities for moral and spiritual growth, ultimately leading to the perfection of human character.

One reflection that arises from Hick’s theodicy is the tension between human free will and the existence of evil. If God allows evil to exist for the purpose of soul-making, it raises the question of how much suffering and evil can be attributed to human choices and actions, rather than being part of a divine plan. Does God intervene to prevent certain evils or does He simply allow them to occur, providing humans with the opportunity to learn and develop through their own actions and experiences?

Additionally, Hick’s theodicy raises the issue of the unequal distribution of suffering and evil in the world. If suffering is meant to be a part of the soul-making process, it seems unjust that some individuals experience far greater degrees of suffering than others. Theodicies like Hick’s often struggle to provide satisfactory explanations for the extreme forms of pain and injustice that exist in the world.

Furthermore, while Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy offers a potential explanation for the existence of evil, it does not directly address the problem of natural evils, such as natural disasters or diseases. How do these fit into the framework of soul-making? Are they necessary components of the soul-making process, or do they present separate challenges that require further exploration?

Overall, Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy presents a thought-provoking perspective on the problem of evil. However, it leaves room for further questioning and examination regarding the relationship between human free will, the distribution of suffering, and the role of natural evils in the process of soul-making.

Reading Journal 4 – Reflection on Anselm’s Ontological Argument

Anselm’s Ontological Argument for the existence of God is a fascinating philosophical argument that attempts to establish God’s existence based on the concept of a being “greater than which nothing can be conceived.” Anselm argues that if we can conceive of such a being, it must exist in reality, as existence in reality is greater than existence solely in the mind.

Reflecting on this argument, one notable aspect is the conceptual nature of the argument itself. Anselm relies heavily on abstract reasoning and the power of human intellect to conceive of a perfect being. This raises the question of whether the mere conceptualization of something necessarily corresponds to its existence in reality. Are we justified in asserting that the existence of an idea or concept implies the existence of an actual entity?

Furthermore, Anselm’s argument is often criticized for its assumption that existence is a defining characteristic of greatness. Critics argue that existence is not necessarily a quality that adds greatness to a being. One can conceive of many non-existent things that possess qualities of greatness, but it does not follow that these things must exist.

Moreover, Anselm’s argument seems to presuppose a shared understanding and agreement on the concept of a perfect being. However, different individuals and cultures may have varying conceptions of what constitutes perfection or greatness. This raises the question of whether the ontological argument can be universally convincing or if its persuasiveness is contingent upon one’s pre-existing beliefs and conceptual framework.

In conclusion, Anselm’s Ontological Argument presents an intriguing philosophical exploration of the existence of God. However, it also raises important questions regarding the relationship between conceptualization and existence, the assumption of existence as a defining characteristic of greatness, and the subjectivity of conceptions of perfection. These questions invite further reflection and critical analysis of the ontological argument and its implications for the existence of God.

 

Homework Writing Bay
Calculator

Calculate the price of your paper

Total price:$26
Our features

We've got everything to become your favourite writing service

Need a better grade?
We've got you covered.

Order your paper