This is your epistemology reading journal in the crash course philosophy video the Host means you want the Grettier case or Grettier problems. Those are cases wherein one may have a justified true belief (for example that there is a sheep in the field but the person actually sees a dog). This is the case where wants is to have knowledge (I am sure that the only thing in the distance is a ship) but I am actually seeing a wooly dog (but there is a sheep hidden from my view in the same field).
QUESTION
PHIL-1030-101-Introduction to Philosophy
This is your epistemology reading journal in the crash course philosophy video the Host means you want the Grettier case or Grettier problems. Those are cases wherein one may have a justified true belief (for example that there is a sheep in the field but the person actually sees a dog). This is the case where wants is to have knowledge (I am sure that the only thing in the distance is a ship) but I am actually seeing a wooly dog (but there is a sheep hidden from my view in the same field).
So in your journal, reflect on these cases that challenge our idea of knowledge. Are there moments of Grettier cases that you have experienced (where you are right for the wrong reasons)?
Reading Journal 5
For this journal, I asked that you write a brief reflection or raise a question about Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy (pp. 88-91)
Reading Journal 4
For this journal please submit a brief reflection on either Anselm’s Ontological or Aquinas cosmological arguments for God’s existence.
ANSWER
Reading Journal 5 – Reflection on Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy
Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy presents an intriguing perspective on the problem of evil and the existence of God. In this theodicy, Hick argues that the presence of evil and suffering in the world is necessary for the development and growth of human souls. He suggests that God allows evil as a means to create opportunities for moral and spiritual growth, ultimately leading to the perfection of human character.
One reflection that arises from Hick’s theodicy is the tension between human free will and the existence of evil. If God allows evil to exist for the purpose of soul-making, it raises the question of how much suffering and evil can be attributed to human choices and actions, rather than being part of a divine plan. Does God intervene to prevent certain evils or does He simply allow them to occur, providing humans with the opportunity to learn and develop through their own actions and experiences?
Additionally, Hick’s theodicy raises the issue of the unequal distribution of suffering and evil in the world. If suffering is meant to be a part of the soul-making process, it seems unjust that some individuals experience far greater degrees of suffering than others. Theodicies like Hick’s often struggle to provide satisfactory explanations for the extreme forms of pain and injustice that exist in the world.
Furthermore, while Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy offers a potential explanation for the existence of evil, it does not directly address the problem of natural evils, such as natural disasters or diseases. How do these fit into the framework of soul-making? Are they necessary components of the soul-making process, or do they present separate challenges that require further exploration?
Overall, Hick’s “Soul-Making” Theodicy presents a thought-provoking perspective on the problem of evil. However, it leaves room for further questioning and examination regarding the relationship between human free will, the distribution of suffering, and the role of natural evils in the process of soul-making.
Reading Journal 4 – Reflection on Anselm’s Ontological Argument
Anselm’s Ontological Argument for the existence of God is a fascinating philosophical argument that attempts to establish God’s existence based on the concept of a being “greater than which nothing can be conceived.” Anselm argues that if we can conceive of such a being, it must exist in reality, as existence in reality is greater than existence solely in the mind.
Reflecting on this argument, one notable aspect is the conceptual nature of the argument itself. Anselm relies heavily on abstract reasoning and the power of human intellect to conceive of a perfect being. This raises the question of whether the mere conceptualization of something necessarily corresponds to its existence in reality. Are we justified in asserting that the existence of an idea or concept implies the existence of an actual entity?
Furthermore, Anselm’s argument is often criticized for its assumption that existence is a defining characteristic of greatness. Critics argue that existence is not necessarily a quality that adds greatness to a being. One can conceive of many non-existent things that possess qualities of greatness, but it does not follow that these things must exist.
Moreover, Anselm’s argument seems to presuppose a shared understanding and agreement on the concept of a perfect being. However, different individuals and cultures may have varying conceptions of what constitutes perfection or greatness. This raises the question of whether the ontological argument can be universally convincing or if its persuasiveness is contingent upon one’s pre-existing beliefs and conceptual framework.
In conclusion, Anselm’s Ontological Argument presents an intriguing philosophical exploration of the existence of God. However, it also raises important questions regarding the relationship between conceptualization and existence, the assumption of existence as a defining characteristic of greatness, and the subjectivity of conceptions of perfection. These questions invite further reflection and critical analysis of the ontological argument and its implications for the existence of God.

We've got everything to become your favourite writing service
Money back guarantee
Your money is safe. Even if we fail to satisfy your expectations, you can always request a refund and get your money back.
Confidentiality
We don’t share your private information with anyone. What happens on our website stays on our website.
Our service is legit
We provide you with a sample paper on the topic you need, and this kind of academic assistance is perfectly legitimate.
Get a plagiarism-free paper
We check every paper with our plagiarism-detection software, so you get a unique paper written for your particular purposes.
We can help with urgent tasks
Need a paper tomorrow? We can write it even while you’re sleeping. Place an order now and get your paper in 8 hours.
Pay a fair price
Our prices depend on urgency. If you want a cheap essay, place your order in advance. Our prices start from $11 per page.