Current theory/ hypothesis are The United States will intervene in another state’s conflict, with military force when there is an economic gain for the United States. Alternative Hypothesis: The United States will intervene with military force to further establish its role as the leading world power.

QUESTION

Current theory/ hypothesis are The United States will intervene in another state’s conflict, with military force when there is an economic gain for the United States.
Alternative Hypothesis:
The United States will intervene with military force to further establish its role as the leading world power.
Please use these hypothesis they can be changed a bit to fit with the paper but they should stay relatively the same.
The cases I have selected are Iraq and Libya. How the U.S used military intervention with the war in Iraq and how they did not intervene in Libya.
Realism is the main theory I used to support those hypotheses, but an alternative theory will need to be research for the Literature review and counter argument.
Use subheadings to organize the paper.
Include graphs and charts to the Methodology/ case selection part of the paper to prove your point.
Include bibliography.

ANSWER

Exploring U.S. Military Interventions: Economic Gain vs. Establishing World Power

Introduction

The United States has a long history of military interventions in various conflicts around the world. This paper aims to examine the factors influencing U.S. military intervention in state conflicts, with a specific focus on the cases of Iraq and Libya. The two competing hypotheses to be explored are as follows: (1) the United States intervenes with military force when there is an economic gain at stake, and (2) the United States intervenes to further establish its role as the leading world power. This analysis will be conducted within the framework of Realism, while also considering alternative theories for a comprehensive literature review and counter-argument.

1. The Hypotheses
2. Hypothesis 1: The United States will intervene in another state’s conflict with military force when there is an economic gain for the United States.
3. Hypothesis 2: The United States will intervene with military force to further establish its role as the leading world power.

Methodology and Case Selection

To evaluate the hypotheses, we will analyze the cases of Iraq and Libya. The selection of these cases is based on their significance in contemporary U.S. foreign policy and the availability of relevant data. The methodology will employ a comparative approach, examining the military interventions in both countries to draw meaningful conclusions.

Analysis of U.S. Military Intervention in Iraq

1. Background and Justifications for Intervention:

   – Provide a brief overview of the Iraq War and the reasons behind U.S. military intervention.

   – Discuss the economic factors that influenced the decision to intervene, such as oil reserves and strategic interests.

   – Present evidence, including graphs and charts, showcasing the economic benefits the United States sought to gain from the conflict.

1. Realist Perspective:

   – Apply Realist principles to support Hypothesis 1, highlighting how economic gain aligns with Realist tenets.

   – Discuss how Realism explains the U.S. interest in securing economic resources and maintaining global dominance.

   – Present counter-arguments to consider alternative explanations.

Analysis of U.S. Non-Intervention in Libya

1. Background and Justifications for Non-Intervention:

   – Provide an overview of the Libyan conflict and the reasons behind the U.S. decision not to intervene militarily.

   – Explore the absence of significant economic gains as a potential factor influencing the U.S. stance.

   – Present evidence, including graphs and charts, illustrating the lack of economic interests for the United States in Libya.

 Alternative Theory: Considerations Beyond Economic Gain

   – Research and present an alternative theoretical perspective to explain the U.S. non-intervention in Libya.

   – Analyze the possible role of humanitarian concerns, regional dynamics, or international pressure in shaping U.S. decision-making.

   – Compare and contrast the alternative theory with Realism to provide a balanced assessment.

Conclusion

Summarize the findings from the analysis of the Iraq and Libya cases within the framework of the competing hypotheses.

Reinforce the supporting evidence for Hypothesis 1, emphasizing the role of economic gain in U.S. military interventions.

Acknowledge the complexities of U.S. foreign policy decision-making and the potential influence of alternative factors.

Highlight the importance of further research to explore additional case studies and theories in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of U.S. military intervention