This week, you will submit the final draft of your informative paper. This 4- to 5-paragraph paper explores a controversial topic in an informative style. This means that the writer must present an equal amount of information for both points of view related to the topic without providing personal thought or opinion. Provide factual information from credible sources to highlight each side. Your paper must include: Introduction (1 paragraph) Body (2–3 paragraphs) Remember to use APA-style formatted in-text citations throughout your paper. Conclusion (1 paragraph) Reference list written in APA style format, in which you list a minimum of 4 total resources

QUESTION

Week 4 Writing Assignment: Informative Paper Final Draft

This week, you will submit the final draft of your informative paper.

This 4- to 5-paragraph paper explores a controversial topic in an informative style. This means that the writer must present an equal amount of information for both points of view related to the topic without providing personal thought or opinion. Provide factual information from credible sources to highlight each side. Your paper must include:

• Introduction (1 paragraph)
• Body (2–3 paragraphs) Remember to use APA-style formatted in-text citations throughout your paper.
• Conclusion (1 paragraph)
• Reference list written in APA style format, in which you list a minimum of 4 total resources

• ANSWER

• The Controversy Surrounding Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)

  Introduction

  Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have become a highly debated topic in recent years. Supporters argue that GMOs offer numerous benefits, including increased crop yield and improved nutritional content. On the other hand, opponents raise concerns about potential health risks and environmental impact. This informative paper aims to present an unbiased overview of the controversy surrounding GMOs, exploring both sides of the argument based on credible sources.

  Body

  Benefits of GMOs

  Proponents of GMOs assert that genetic modification can provide substantial advantages for agriculture and food production. Through genetic engineering techniques, scientists can introduce specific traits into crops, resulting in several benefits:

  Enhanced Crop Yield

  GMOs have the potential to increase agricultural productivity by developing crops with improved resistance to pests, diseases, and adverse environmental conditions (Whitman, 2000). This increased yield can help address food shortages and potentially reduce world hunger.

  Nutritional Improvements

  Genetic modification allows for the enrichment of crops with essential nutrients, such as vitamins and minerals. This biofortification approach can help combat malnutrition and improve public health, particularly in developing countries (Hans, 2017).

  Reduction in Chemical Pesticide Use

  Some genetically modified crops are engineered to produce natural insecticides, reducing the need for chemical pesticides. This can benefit both human health and the environment by minimizing exposure to harmful chemicals (Whitman, 2000).

  Concerns and Criticisms of GMOs

  Opponents of GMOs raise several concerns related to their potential risks and ethical implications. It is important to consider these viewpoints to have a comprehensive understanding of the controversy:

  Health Risks

  Critics argue that GMOs may have adverse health effects due to potential allergenicity, toxicity, or unintended consequences of genetic manipulation. Although extensive scientific research has not found conclusive evidence of harm to human health, ongoing studies continue to examine the long-term effects (Clive, 2018).

  Environmental Impact

  Some worry that GMOs can harm biodiversity and disrupt ecosystems. Concerns include the potential spread of modified genes to non-target species, the emergence of herbicide-resistant “superweeds,” and the loss of genetic diversity in crops (Pereira et al., 2019). Maintaining biodiversity is crucial for the resilience and sustainability of ecosystems.

  Ethical and Socioeconomic Concerns

  Critics argue that GMOs are primarily developed by large biotechnology corporations, leading to concerns about monopolization of the seed industry and the dependence of farmers on these companies. There are also ethical concerns regarding the patenting of living organisms and the potential violation of farmers’ rights (Jaffe et al., 2014).

  Conclusion

  The controversy surrounding GMOs stems from the complex interplay between potential benefits and perceived risks. While supporters emphasize the increased crop yield, improved nutrition, and reduced chemical pesticide use, opponents raise concerns about health risks, environmental impact, and socioeconomic implications. As the debate continues, it is crucial to maintain an open and informed dialogue, considering the latest scientific research and engaging in evidence-based decision-making.

  References

  Clive, J. (2018). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2017. ISAAA Brief No. 53. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications.

  Hans, R. (2017). Biofortification: A Sustainable Agricultural Strategy for Reducing Micronutrient Malnutrition in the Global South. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1607.

  Jaffe, G., Sheldon, R., Eckerstorfer, M., Fontes, E., Kuzma, J., Manshardt, R.,

   … & Voytas, D. (2014). A proposed unified nomenclature for plant biotechnology products. GM Crops & Food, 5(2), 81-83.

  Pereira, L. M., Burgos, N. R., Figueiredo, M. R., & Westra, P. (2019). The impact of glyphosate-resistant crops in the Americas. GM Crops & Food, 10(4), 219-231.

  Whitman, D. (2000). Genetically Modified Foods: Harmful or Helpful? The Environmental Magazine, 11(1).