Field: Law – Criminal Assignment 1: Offenders’ Rights This assignment focuses on a suspect’s rights at the point of arrest and questioning before or after he or she is arrested. Centervale Police Officer Michael James is questioning a suspect. When the suspect asks whether he can leave, Officer James tells him that he cannot leave and continues questioning without informing the subject of his rights.

QUESTION

  • Field: Law – Criminal

Assignment 1: Offenders’ Rights

This assignment focuses on a suspect’s rights at the point of arrest and questioning before or after he or she is arrested.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Field: Law – Criminal Assignment 1: Offenders’ Rights This assignment focuses on a suspect’s rights at the point of arrest and questioning before or after he or she is arrested. Centervale Police Officer Michael James is questioning a suspect. When the suspect asks whether he can leave, Officer James tells him that he cannot leave and continues questioning without informing the subject of his rights.
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Centervale Police Officer Michael James is questioning a suspect. When the suspect asks whether he can leave, Officer James tells him that he cannot leave and continues questioning without informing the subject of his rights.

ANSWER

Suspect’s Rights at the Point of Arrest and Questioning: A Critical Examination

Introduction

The rights of suspects play a crucial role in the criminal justice system, ensuring fairness and protecting individuals from potential abuses of power. One essential stage in this process is when a suspect is arrested and subjected to questioning. This essay examines a scenario involving Centervale Police Officer Michael James, who fails to inform a suspect of their rights and restricts their freedom to leave during questioning.

The Importance of Suspect’s Rights at the Point of Arrest

The point of arrest is a critical juncture in which suspects become subject to the authority of law enforcement. At this stage, it is essential to ensure that the suspect is aware of their rights, such as the right to remain silent, the right to legal representation, and the right to be informed of the charges against them (Admin, 2021). These rights are enshrined in various legal frameworks, including the United States Constitution’s Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

The Role of Police Officer in Safeguarding Suspect’s Rights

Police officers have a duty to uphold the law while respecting the rights of individuals. It is their responsibility to inform suspects of their rights promptly after the arrest to ensure that the suspect is fully aware of their entitlements and can make informed decisions (9-5.000 – Issues Related to Discovery, Trials, and Other Proceedings, 2020). Failure to fulfill this duty can undermine the suspect’s ability to exercise their rights effectively.

Analysis of the Scenario

In the scenario described, Officer James failed to inform the suspect of their rights and denied the suspect’s request to leave. By withholding crucial information about their rights, Officer James violated the suspect’s right to be informed. This lack of information may lead the suspect to inadvertently waive their rights or be coerced into providing self-incriminating statements.

Legal Consequences of Violating Suspect’s Rights

The failure to inform a suspect of their rights and restricting their freedom to leave during questioning can have significant legal implications. In many jurisdictions, evidence obtained through such violations may be deemed inadmissible in court (Turner & Weigend, 2019). This exclusionary rule aims to deter law enforcement officers from disregarding suspects’ rights and ensures the integrity of the criminal justice system.

Remedies and Protections for Suspects

To protect suspects’ rights, it is crucial to adhere to established legal procedures. Officers should provide a Miranda warning, which includes informing the suspect of their rights, before proceeding with questioning. If a suspect’s rights have been violated, they may seek remedies through legal channels, such as filing a motion to suppress evidence or raising the issue during trial.

Conclusion

The scenario involving Officer James highlights the significance of respecting a suspect’s rights at the point of arrest and during questioning. Suspects must be informed of their rights promptly, allowing them to make informed decisions and protect themselves. By failing to fulfill this obligation, Officer James not only violated the suspect’s rights but also potentially compromised the admissibility of evidence obtained during the questioning. Upholding suspects’ rights is essential for a fair and just criminal justice system that balances law enforcement objectives with individual liberties.

References

9-5.000 – Issues Related To Discovery, Trials, And Other Proceedings. (2020, January 29). JM | Department of Justice. https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-5000-issues-related-trials-and-other-court-proceedings 

Admin. (2021). The Presumption of Innocence and the Media Coverage of Criminal Cases. Arisa. https://arisa-project.eu/the-presumption-of-innocence-and-the-media-coverage-of-criminal-cases/ 

Turner, J. I., & Weigend, T. (2019). The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview. In Springer eBooks (pp. 255–282). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2_8 

 

Homework Writing Bay
Calculator

Calculate the price of your paper

Total price:$26
Our features

We've got everything to become your favourite writing service

Need a better grade?
We've got you covered.

Order your paper