Rogerian Outline & 1st Draft Essay I.Introduction a.Attention grabber (1-2 sentences) b.The overall problem between the two parties or stakeholders (1-3 sentences) c.Background (2-3 sentences of the who, what, when, where, and why related to the topic). Cover this for both stakeholders. d.Thesis (1-2 sentences and underline). This should offer the solutions, preferably in two to threeprongs. II.1st body paragraph (should contain at least 10 sentences or a 1/3 of the page) a.Topic sentence (1 sentence). The first stakeholder (the stakeholder you oppose). The stakeholder’s belief (2-3 sentences) b.Research, quote or paraphrase, that support’s stakeholder’s belief (1-3 sentences). This is about material the SUPPORTS this stakeholder. c.Significance of quoted or paraphrase material (3-4 sentences) d.Conclusion of overall importance and summarize meaning of stakeholder’s argument (2-3 sentences and the “so what” of the paragraph)

QUESTION

Outline Directions: Although the information in the parenthesis (below) guides you to write 1-4 sentences, for the purpose of your outline, you only need a sentence to complete each part of the outline. Remember the more details you give, the better your essay.

The first draft should contain between 900-1,100 words, but the final draft’s word count should contain between 1,200 -1,400.

Worth 200 Quiz Points

I.Introduction

a.Attention grabber (1-2 sentences)

b.The overall problem between the two parties or stakeholders (1-3 sentences)

c.Background (2-3 sentences of the who, what, when, where, and why related to the topic). Cover this for both stakeholders.

d.Thesis (1-2 sentences and underline). This should offer the solutions, preferably in two to threeprongs.

II.1^st body paragraph (should contain at least 10 sentences or a 1/3 of the page)

a.Topic sentence (1 sentence). The first stakeholder (the stakeholder you oppose). The stakeholder’s belief (2-3 sentences)

b.Research, quote or paraphrase, that support’s stakeholder’s belief (1-3 sentences). This is about material the SUPPORTS this stakeholder.

c.Significance of quoted or paraphrase material (3-4 sentences)

d.Conclusion of overall importance and summarize meaning of stakeholder’s argument (2-3 sentences and the “so what” of the paragraph)

III.2nd body paragraph (should contain at least 10 sentences or a 1/3 of the page)

a.Topic sentence (1 sentence). The second stakeholder (the stakeholder you agree with). The stakeholder’s belief (2-3 sentences)

e.Research, quote or paraphrase, that support’s stakeholder’s belief (1-3 sentences). This is about material the SUPPORTS this stakeholder.

b.Significance of quoted or paraphrase material (3-4 sentences)

c.Conclusion of overall importance and summarize meaning of stakeholder’s argument (2-3 sentences and the “so what” of the paragraph)

IV.Compromise (Middle ground)

a.Topic sentence, discussing similarities

b.Explanation of topic sentence (2-3 sentences)

c.The problem summarized again, (1-3 sentences)

V.Solution 1

a.What would be a possible middle ground between the two parties

b.Research that supports the middle ground

c.A limitation with this middle ground

d.How to modify and fix this possible limitation

Solution 2

a. What would be a possible middle ground between the two parties

b. Research that supports the middle ground

c. A limitation with this middle ground

d. How to modify and fix this possible limitation

VI.Conclusion

a.Which middle ground works best and why

b.How would this middle ground fix other surrounding issues

c.Next steps

___________________________________________________

Subject: 1st Draft of Rogerian Essay — 900- 1,200 word count

— Add the word count in RED under the date in your paper

— Highlight the two (2) solutions

— Include a Works Cited page, and must be in MLA format. NEED (6) SOURCES or MORE.

NOTE: You need to highlight four (4) other areas and ADD them to your key at the Top of your paper. You Must employ the appeals TWICE.

1. When you use Ethos

2. When you use Logos

3. When you use Pathos

4. When you use Kairos

please highlight those sections in the essay as writing it

ANSWER

Striking the Balance: Resolving the Conflict Between Privacy Advocates and Law Enforcement

 Introduction

Attention grabber: In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, the clash between privacy advocates and law enforcement agencies has become increasingly pronounced.

The overall problem between the two parties or stakeholders

The fundamental issue revolves around striking the right balance between individual privacy rights and the need for effective law enforcement to ensure public safety and security.

 Background

Privacy advocates argue for robust safeguards to protect individuals’ personal information and limit government surveillance, while law enforcement agencies emphasize the necessity of accessing certain data for investigative purposes (Waldo et al., 2007b). This conflict arises in various contexts, such as encrypted communications, data retention policies, and the use of emerging technologies. Both stakeholders are motivated by their concerns for privacy and security, albeit with different priorities.

 Thesis

To address the ongoing conflict between privacy advocates and law enforcement agencies, a comprehensive solution must incorporate the following prongs: 1) the development of transparent and accountable surveillance practices, 2) the establishment of clear legal frameworks that respect privacy rights without hindering legitimate investigations, and 3) the promotion of technological advancements that simultaneously enhance privacy and aid law enforcement efforts.

1st body paragraph

 Topic sentence: Privacy advocates, as one stakeholder in the debate, firmly believe in the importance of protecting individuals’ privacy and limiting government intrusion into personal lives (Soken-Huberty, 2020).

Research, quote, or paraphrase that supports stakeholder’s belief

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), “Privacy is a fundamental human right recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” emphasizing the significance of privacy in maintaining individual autonomy and dignity (OHCHR, n.d.).

Significance of quoted or paraphrased material

This quote highlights the ethical and moral foundations underlying privacy advocates’ position. By recognizing privacy as a fundamental right, the importance of safeguarding personal information against unwarranted access or surveillance is underscored.

 Conclusion of overall importance and summarize meaning of stakeholder’s argument: Privacy advocates argue that protecting privacy is crucial for upholding individual freedoms, preventing potential abuses of power, and fostering trust between individuals and the state. Their position emphasizes the need to establish robust safeguards that limit government overreach and promote transparency in surveillance practices, ultimately safeguarding the democratic values of a society. This highlights the significance of privacy as a core aspect of individual rights and the broader societal implications of its protection.

References

OHCHR. (n.d.). The right to privacy in the digital age. https://www.ohchr.org/en/stories/2013/10/right-privacy-digital-age 

Soken-Huberty, E. (2020). 10 Reasons Why Privacy Rights are Important. Human Rights Careers. https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/reasons-why-privacy-rights-are-important/ 

Waldo, J. H., Lin, H. Y., & Millett, L. I. (2007b). Engaging Privacy and Information Technology in a Digital Age. In National Academies Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17226/11896