Form 2: Diagnosis and Rule-Out The purpose of this form is to organize the diagnosis of the client in your Case Study. This form will not be used for Case Study 11 & 14 – these have their own directions. 1. Name of Client__________________________________________ 2. Major Mental Health issue (please use F codes and the correct name of the disorder to include severity): 3. Personality Disorder and Neurodevelopment Disorders (please use F codes and the correct name of the disorder to include severity): 4. Medical Condition(s):

QUESTION

Form 2: Diagnosis and Rule-Out The purpose of this form is to organize the diagnosis of the client in your Case Study.

This form will not be used for Case Study 11 & 14 – these have their own directions. 1. Name of Client__________________________________________

2. Major Mental Health issue (please use F codes and the correct name of the disorder to include severity):

3. Personality Disorder and Neurodevelopment Disorders (please use F codes and the correct name of the disorder to include severity):

4. Medical Condition(s):

5. Level of Functioning and Potential Prognosis:

6. Other Conditions that may be the focus of Clinical Attention (these are found in the DSM IV):

7. Differential Diagnosis. This is the diagnosis that may be of consideration but does not quite fit – you are trying to rule it out. An example of a differential diagnosis for bipolar disorder (DSM V, pg. 167) are: manic episodes; mood disorder due to a medical condition; substance abuse mood disorder; and ADHD.

8. Defend your diagnosis. An example for the defense of major depression would be: Client has 7 of the 9 criterial for Major Depressive disorder (DSM V, pg. 161).

Form 3: Article Summary

The purpose of this form is to organize the five (5) article summaries related to the case study. Please use APA format and summarize using at least 6-8 sentences. If you are using electronic websites they MUST BE .org/.edu/.gov URL. 1. Title Article 1: APA Reference for Article

1: Summary (6-8 sentences): 2. Title Article 2: APA Reference for Article 2: Summary (6-8 sentences): 3. Title Article 3: APA Reference for Article 3: Summary (6-8 sentences): 4. Title Article 4: APA Reference for Article 4: Summary (6-8 sentences): 5. Title Article 5: APA Reference for Article 5: Summary (6-8 sentences):

Grading rubric

ubric Case Study Case Study Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion 3.0 pts (A Work)

Work is significantly above the expected level and demonstrates excellent mastery of analysis of the topic, connectivity of examples and definitions. Less than 5 APA/Grammatical Errors.

2.5 pts (B Work)

Work is written above the expected level. Student demonstrates slightly above average analysis of topic. The topic is developed with connectivity to examples and definitions. Less than 10 and more than 6 APA/Grammatical Errors.

2.25 pts (C- Work)

Work is below expected levels. Superficial analysis, no depth in examples, no definitions. Sentence structure is incomplete. More than 10 APA/Grammatical Errors. 2.0 pts

(D Work)

Work is consistently below expected levels. Undeveloped sentence structures with no analysis, no examples, no definitions, no references. More than 10 APA/Grammatical Errors. 0.0 pts No Marks Student did not submit the assignment 3.0 pts Total Points: 3

Here is video to the case study

ANSWER