This only needs to be 2 paragraphs long (one paragraph per question), response answering the following questions: How does “Dirty Work” compare with other scholarship we have read on either internal or external efforts to change police culture to be more open to diversity? What was the Philadelphia Civilian Advisory Board meant to achieve? Why do the authors conclude that it failed in its mission?

QUESTION

This only needs to be 2 paragraphs long (one paragraph per question), response answering the following questions:

How does “Dirty Work” compare with other scholarship we have read on either internal or external efforts to change police culture to be more open to diversity?

What was the Philadelphia Civilian Advisory Board meant to achieve? Why do the authors conclude that it failed in its mission?

ANSWER

Analyzing “Dirty Work” and the Failures of the Philadelphia Civilian Advisory Board in Promoting Police Diversity and Accountability

“Dirty Work” presents a unique perspective on efforts to change police culture in relation to diversity, setting itself apart from other scholarship we have encountered. While previous research has primarily focused on external initiatives such as policy reforms or community engagement programs, “Dirty Work” delves into the internal dynamics within police organizations (Police Culture in a Changing World, n.d.). The book explores the experiences of undercover officers who are tasked with infiltrating racist and extremist groups, shedding light on the complexities and challenges of promoting diversity within the police force. By providing an insider’s view, the authors reveal the deep-rooted cultural barriers that impede progress and highlight the need for systemic changes that address both external and internal factors (Ruggiero et al., 2021).

In terms of the Philadelphia Civilian Advisory Board, its intended purpose was to serve as an independent oversight body tasked with holding the police department accountable and fostering community trust. However, the authors contend that the board failed to achieve its mission. They argue that its ineffectiveness stemmed from several factors. First, the board lacked true independence and authority, as it was unable to make binding decisions or enforce accountability measures (Enforcing Police Accountability Through Civilian Oversight, n.d.). Second, the composition of the board was not sufficiently diverse and representative of the community it aimed to serve, undermining its legitimacy and ability to address systemic issues. Finally, the authors assert that the board’s limited resources and insufficient support from the police department hindered its capacity to effectively investigate and address complaints against officers. These shortcomings collectively led to the board’s failure in achieving its goals of accountability, community engagement, and fostering meaningful change within the Philadelphia Police Department.

References

Enforcing Police Accountability through Civilian Oversight. (n.d.). Google Books. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=g5aHAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=+In+terms+of+the+Philadelphia+Civilian+Advisory+Board,+its+intended+purpose+was+to+serve+as+an+independent+oversight+body+tasked+with+holding+the+police+department+accountable+and+fostering+community+trust.&ots=Jeu3fNSiqI&sig=WkyAj-d3b8tAM5TisSgapInQEc4 

Police Culture in a Changing World. (n.d.). Google Books. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=KXLRiEMufisC&oi=fnd&pg=PR17&dq=%22Dirty+Work%22+presents+a+unique+perspective+on+efforts+to+change+police+culture+in+relation+to+diversity,+setting+itself+apart+from+other+scholarship+we+have+encountered.+&ots=KCHmCdtTYC&sig= 

Ruggiero, S. L., Busch, H., Hansen, T., & Isakovic, A. (2021). Context and agency in urban community energy initiatives: An analysis of six case studies from the Baltic Sea Region. Energy Policy, 148, 111956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111956