In Essay #1, you were asked to do a basic analysis of one essay.  In that analysis you focused on one specific claim and evidence, and counter-arguments used by that author to support his thesis. 

QUESTION

RWS 280      Essay #2 Prompt                                                     Spring 2020                                                                Analyzing & Evaluating Conventions in Academic Texts___

The readings:           “Amethyst Initiative’s Debate On Drinking a Welcome Alternative to Fanaticism”                       by Radley Balko        FoxNews.com Aug. 25, 2008                                                    “There’s No Benefit to Lowering the Drinking Age”                                                       by Robert Voas        Christian Science Monitor  Jan. 12, 2006 

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
In Essay #1, you were asked to do a basic analysis of one essay.  In that analysis you focused on one specific claim and evidence, and counter-arguments used by that author to support his thesis. 
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

In Essay #1, you were asked to do a basic analysis of one essay.  In that analysis you focused on one specific claim and evidence, and counter-arguments used by that author to support his thesis.  In Essay #2 you will be asked to extend your analysis by identifying and analyzing conventions in academic texts.  As defined by Webster’s College Dictionary, a convention refers to “a rule, method, or practice established by usage… a general custom or accepted usage.”  For this essay, you’ll be asked to focus on the use of tone and evidence, and to evaluate the effectiveness of these conventions on readers like you.

You will need a Works Cited page, which means that you will also need to include the parenthetical citations after each reference to the author’s text (both direct quotes and paraphrases).  Be SURE to use the Essay #2 Writing Strategy, at least as a checklist, to make sure you detail all parts of this prompt in your essay.  You may also use it to organize and structure your essay.  In the Writing Strategy, I have once again given you a sample thesis you can use in your essay, as well as provided more detailed information about how to develop your analysis and evaluation.

The prompt:   Choose one of the above articles, and write an academic essay that:

  1. Identifies the author’s purpose, goal and audience (this will require a little research to identify who reads this publication);

 

  1. Identifies and analyzes at least one specific example of tone in the author’s introduction, detailing how that specific example tone is repeated or extended somewhere else in the body paragraphs of the article. You must also evaluate how this use of tone affected your initial response to that author’s argument.

 

For a C paper, one example is fine; for a grade higher than a C, you will need to analyze two examples;

 

  1. Identifies and analyzes at least one example of evidence on readers like you.  Your analysis will need to include detailing the persuasive appeal(s) for that specific example.  You must also evaluate the effectiveness of this example and how it helped you see the issue in a different light or helped to reinforce your position.

 

For a C paper, detailing one example will be fine. For a B paper, you’ll need to detail two examples of evidence.  For an A paper you’ll need to detail three examples of evidence.

Regarding the effectiveness of the use of tone and evidence, be sure to detail how the author’s use of these conventions have changed or re-enforced your views on this topic.  Remember, the point of the prompt is not to agree or disagree with the authors. Rather, how has the way the author presented and supported his argument effected your perception of, or attitude towards, this issue?  You will be evaluated not only on how adequately you respond to the all parts of the prompt and develop your points but also on how you organize your response.

ANSWER

Analyzing and Evaluating Conventions in Academic Texts: A Critical Examination of Tone and Evidence in “Amethyst Initiative’s Debate On Drinking a Welcome Alternative to Fanaticism” by Radley Balko

 

Introduction

Academic texts often employ various conventions to effectively convey their arguments to the target audience. This essay aims to analyze and evaluate the conventions of tone and evidence used in Radley Balko’s article, “Amethyst Initiative’s Debate On Drinking a Welcome Alternative to Fanaticism.” By examining the author’s purpose, identifying specific examples of tone, and analyzing the evidence presented, this essay will assess the effectiveness of these conventions in shaping readers’ perceptions and attitudes towards the issue.

 

 Identification of Author’s Purpose, Goal, and Audience

To comprehend the author’s intent, it is crucial to delve into their purpose, goal, and target audience. Radley Balko, in his article published on FoxNews.com on August 25, 2008, aims to present the Amethyst Initiative’s debate on the drinking age as a viable alternative to fanaticism. The author’s goal is to advocate for a reconsideration of the legal drinking age in the United States (Caines et al., 2018). The audience primarily consists of readers of Fox News, who are likely to hold conservative viewpoints and are interested in social and political issues.

 Analysis of Tone in the Introduction

Tone plays a vital role in shaping readers’ perceptions and establishing the author’s stance. In Balko’s introduction, a specific example of tone can be observed:

 

Example 1: Balko employs an assertive and persuasive tone when he states, “It’s time for an adult conversation about the drinking age.” This authoritative tone is further reinforced throughout the article, guiding the readers towards accepting the author’s argument.

 

Evaluation of the Impact of Tone on Initial Response

The use of an assertive and persuasive tone in Balko’s introduction creates an immediate impact on the readers. The author’s confident stance grabs the attention of the audience and sets the tone for the entire article. This authoritative tone affected my initial response by making me curious about the author’s argument and more inclined to consider his perspective seriously. The tone’s influence on my initial response highlighted the effectiveness of using a strong tone to capture readers’ attention and engage them in the discussion.

 

Analysis of Evidence on Readers

Evidence plays a crucial role in persuading readers and supporting the author’s claims. Balko incorporates various examples of evidence throughout the article, one of which can be analyzed as follows:

 

Example 2: Balko cites statistical data from European countries where the legal drinking age is lower, demonstrating that those nations have lower rates of binge drinking among young adults. This evidence appeals to the readers’ logical reasoning by presenting a comparative analysis that challenges the effectiveness of a higher drinking age (Reschly et al., 2009).

 

Example 3: Furthermore, the author references the Amethyst Initiative, a coalition of college presidents advocating for the reevaluation of the drinking age, as evidence to support the argument for alternative approaches. This appeal to authority enhances the credibility of Balko’s position and influences readers by associating the argument with respected individuals and institutions.

 

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Evidence

The inclusion of statistical data and the reference to the Amethyst Initiative as evidence effectively strengthens Balko’s argument. The use of statistical evidence appeals to readers’ logical reasoning by presenting a factual basis for reconsidering the drinking age. Additionally, the appeal to authority lends credibility to the author’s position, encouraging readers to view the argument as more valid and deserving of consideration. The effective use of evidence in the article provided me with a fresh perspective on the issue and reinforced my belief in the need for a nuanced discussion on the drinking age.

 

 Reflection on the Effectiveness of Tone and Evidence

Balko’s skillful use of tone and evidence effectively influenced my perception and attitude towards the issue. The assertive and persuasive tone captured my attention and encouraged me to consider the author’s argument more seriously (Greiner et al., 2019). The incorporation of statistical data and appeals to authority enhanced the credibility and persuasiveness of the article, leading me to reassess my initial stance on the topic. The strategic use of these conventions showcased the author’s ability to shape readers’ perceptions and stimulate critical thinking.

 

Conclusion

In conclusion, Radley Balko’s article, “Amethyst Initiative’s Debate On Drinking a Welcome Alternative to Fanaticism,” effectively employs the conventions of tone and evidence to engage readers and advance his argument. By using an assertive and persuasive tone, the author grabs readers’ attention and guides them towards accepting his perspective. The incorporation of statistical data and appeals to authority strengthens the article’s persuasiveness and prompts readers to reevaluate their initial position on the issue. Balko’s skillful use of these conventions highlights their impact on shaping readers’ perceptions and attitudes, underscoring the importance of analyzing and evaluating conventions in academic texts.

 

References

Caines, A., Pastrana, S., Hutchings, A., & Buttery, P. (2018). Automatically identifying the function and intent of posts in underground forums. Crime Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-018-0094-4 

Greiner, A. J., Patelli, L., & Pedrini, M. (2019). Characteristics of Managerial Tone Priced by Auditors: Evidence Based on Annual Letters to Shareholders of Large U.S. Firms. Auditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory, 39(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52594 

Reschly, A. L., Busch, T., Betts, J., Deno, S. L., & Long, J. R. (2009). Curriculum-Based Measurement Oral Reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 427–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001 

 

 

Homework Writing Bay
Calculator

Calculate the price of your paper

Total price:$26
Our features

We've got everything to become your favourite writing service

Need a better grade?
We've got you covered.

Order your paper