Read Sharp’s list of methods of nonviolent action. II. Read Scott’s preface and write a 1 standard page long reflexive essay

QUESTION

I. Read Sharp’s list of methods of nonviolent action.

II. Read Scott’s preface and write a 1 standard page long reflexive essay.

The essay should comprise the following components:

1. Author’s main thesis, described in 2-3 sentences.

2. 3 main arguments supporting the thesis.

3. Methodology used.

The essay could contain critical reflection on the thesis and arguments by other anthropologists or political scientists (no more than 3-4 sentences).

Grading: “yes” or “no”.

ANSWER

Reflexive Essay on the Methods of Nonviolent Action

Introduction

In this reflexive essay, I will explore the main thesis presented by Gene Sharp in his list of methods of nonviolent action. I will provide three arguments that support the thesis and discuss the methodology used in Sharp’s work. Furthermore, I will briefly reflect on the critical views of other anthropologists and political scientists.

Thesis

The main thesis of Gene Sharp’s list of methods of nonviolent action is that nonviolence can be a powerful and effective means of bringing about social and political change. Sharp argues that nonviolent action possesses the potential to challenge oppressive regimes, foster civic engagement, and ultimately lead to transformative social movements.

Argument 1: Challenging Oppressive Regimes

One of the key arguments supporting Sharp’s thesis is that nonviolent action has the potential to challenge and undermine oppressive regimes. By employing methods such as protests, strikes, and civil disobedience, nonviolent actors can disrupt the functioning of oppressive systems and expose their flaws to the public (Schock, 2003). This form of resistance can weaken the legitimacy and authority of oppressive regimes, creating opportunities for change and reform.

Argument 2: Fostering Civic Engagement

Sharp’s second argument highlights the role of nonviolent action in fostering civic engagement and encouraging the participation of ordinary people in political processes. Through methods like grassroots organizing, public awareness campaigns, and community-building initiatives, nonviolent movements can mobilize and empower individuals who might otherwise feel powerless. By providing avenues for citizen involvement, nonviolent action can strengthen democracy and promote a more inclusive and participatory society.

Argument 3: Sparking Transformative Social Movements

The third argument supporting Sharp’s thesis is that nonviolent action has the potential to spark transformative social movements (Demaria et al.,2013). By embodying principles of justice, equality, and human rights, nonviolent movements can inspire collective action and galvanize individuals across different social groups. This unity and shared purpose can create a momentum that leads to widespread social change, challenging entrenched inequalities and fostering a more just and equitable society.

Methodology

Gene Sharp’s methodology in developing his list of methods of nonviolent action is primarily based on empirical observation and analysis  (Sharp 2005). He draws on historical case studies and examples from various social and political contexts to identify and categorize different methods of nonviolent action. Sharp’s approach is grounded in rigorous research, providing a comprehensive overview of the diverse strategies and tactics that have been employed successfully in nonviolent struggles around the world.

Critical Reflection

While Gene Sharp’s work on nonviolent action has been widely influential, it is important to consider critical reflections by other anthropologists and political scientists. Some critics argue that nonviolent action is not always effective in the face of repressive regimes that resort to violence or that rely on sophisticated methods of control. Additionally, some scholars caution against oversimplifying complex social and political dynamics by presenting nonviolent action as a panacea for all forms of conflict and oppression. Nevertheless, Sharp’s contribution in cataloging and analyzing various methods of nonviolent action remains valuable and provides a foundation for further research and exploration.

References

Demaria, F., Schneider, F., Sekulova, F., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2013). What is degrowth? From an activist slogan to a social movement. Environmental values, 22(2), 191-215.https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2013/00000022/00000002/art00005 

Schock, K. (2003). Nonviolent action and its misconceptions: Insights for social scientists. PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(4), 705-712.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/nonviolent-action-and-its-misconceptions-insights-for-social-scientists/98455046684CE1B217FC79B6B06C16EB 

Sharp, G. (2005). Waging nonviolent struggle. Porter Sargent, Boston, 40.https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/book/ciao/0010973/f_0010973_17324.pdf